Perhaps Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks do not generally carry their axes around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence took place in a town club in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some naive slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie websites that are streaming where viewers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off steam, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, https://casinopokies777.com/royalvegas-casino/ but maybe not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either it was a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. Whenever working with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all of the time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete lot of cash. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ Apparently, this really is one worker whom keeps their equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally a tremendously quiet man. He just wandered in very calmly by having an axe and smashed all the devices. There had been several customers by them at that time in addition they had been terrified,’ he added.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with nothing more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The next among these two stories is really a bit more frightening, while the axe was wielded perhaps not during the slots, but at a member of the employees at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with a few money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he don’t comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the crime stated that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm on the nights the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate because of the tree-chopping gun.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police described as a ‘quantity of cash,’ and also the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive in the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While every of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has had its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight within the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposition that would put a casino into the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate option is pertaining to the idea that neighboring communities is affected by casino projects, but won’t have the opportunity to vote on whether those casinos is opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, happens to be one of a handful of applicants whom have recommended that all of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that could be situated in East Boston, for example.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based in the impact it could have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal ended up being voted…on in only one community,’ Conley stated within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and social burdens but receive none of the proposed advantages.’
Based on the state laws that produced the chance of three brand new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino designers are needed to negotiate compensation, with arbitration needed in the event that gambling enterprises and regional governments can’t arrived at an answer on their own.
Conley has proposed taking a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law when it comes to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the complete city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still giving East Boston veto power within the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley hasn’t specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal, a Boston Globe survey discovered that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with only two coming down against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question). Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the whole town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% were and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Regardless if voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by the state due to the fact future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, additionally there is a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing star of the UK’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the recreations book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired premier sports betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing people of the Conservative Party to call out of the shadow business assistant, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double criteria.
Since Gala Coral Group is one for the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the large number of gambling outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the area roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘we understand there is huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with gambling shops and pay day loan businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a written report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public areas and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that’s very unusual for a politician.
Spared for a Technicality
However, fighting back the corner for the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna claimed that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in accordance aided by the guidelines and precisely declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working office of Chuka Umunna in his ability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it does officially pass as legitimate.
And while Goulden is not a relative mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a entirely innocent donation or not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party may just be looking to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using this kind of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their neighborhood constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he undoubtedly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ claimed Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this season their office was accused of editing his Wikipedia page showing comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.